Sunday
Oct052003

Marking Territory

On the local level, candidates usually run their campaign on a shoe string budget. No TV ads. The incumbents spend the most money by throwing big rallies (parties) with an open bar, food, and music. Otherwise most of the money spent, it seems, goes into signs. A lot of energy and scrutiny goes into the placement of signs. The rush to get the signs up is a competition within a competition. There are also rules governing where one can and cannot put their campaign sign. For instance, signs cannot be placed on public property and they cannot be put in a location without the property owner's permission. Rules are made to be broken and sign controversies are not unusual for a local election around here. The primary sign offense is when someone places a sign in a prominent location without permission - say a telephone pole along a highway. Some of the more crafty sign law breakers place them high enough on the pole no average would be sign cop can reach it without a cherry picker. If the candidate for whom the sign supports is confronted about the rule violation, they never know anything about it. "I apologize for one of my obvious over zealous supporters. I would not authorize nor do I condone breaking sign placement laws. We run a clean campaign here . . . blah . . .blah . . .blah." That statement should be spoken with a Foghorn Leghorn accent.
Rational discussions with candidates about campaign signs produce a continuation of irrational behavior. They will say of their opponent, "yes he has a lot of signs out there, but signs don't vote." Then he will get in his car and feverishly post more signs trying to catch up. He will say to his friends, "It looks bad if he has more signs than I do." There may be some benefit in having signs all over the place. When I see a sign in a yard, I figure that household supports that candidate. Depending on who it is it could possibly be influential. I have not noticed increased traffic by my house to see whose signs I have posted though.
A sign can work against you if it is grammatically incorrect. For instance, during a recent election the candidate's name was written in this way, "Ed. Peters." Ever since then he has been known as "Ed Period Peters." He did not win his election either.
Our election sign behavior has its parallel in the animal world. Dogs pee on things to say, "this is my territory." I think putting up a sign is the same thing. Some politician is saying "this is my territory, my supporter." A sign then is a form of pee. Political pee. Maybe that is why in politics there are always "leaks" and politicians get "pissed" off. Maybe that is why there are tax "hikes", and politicians are often all "wet." To carry the comparison further, new politicians are often embraceable, cute, and innocent like puppies. More seasoned politicians can be grumpy and attack like an older dog. Like a pack of wild dogs politicians may devour a weaker one viciously. Some in the political arena more resemble dogs when it comes to sexual behavior. They often have problems controlling their appetites and want what the other "dog" has. Come to think of it politicians are an awful lot like dogs. I like dogs quite a bit though. My dog behaves well because I don't let him get away with things. Sure he may get in the trash occasionally if the lid is left up, but when he hears my voice scolding him he lowers his head and tucks his tail between his legs. Politicians get away with whatever the voters allow them to get away with. Well, these are just some thoughts.
Sunday morning early they will be collecting their signs. I do not know what they do with them but they will disappear until the next election. All of this sign behavior is interesting but, more importantly, beneath it all I have an appreciation for democracy and the power and privilege to choose our leaders and representatives.
Until the next time
John Strain